Readability Score Checker

Score your writing with Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch–Kincaid grade level. Free, in your browser.

Most web content aims for a Flesch score of 60–70 (around grade 7–8). Syllable counts are estimated. Computed in your browser.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Flesch & Flesch–Kincaid
  • Word/sentence counts
  • 100% private
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Sentence-level highlights & suggestions

About the Readability Score Checker

The Readability Score Checker measures how hard your writing is to read and reports it as a number you can act on. Paste any text and it runs the two most widely used formulas: the Flesch Reading Ease score, which lands between 0 and 100 (higher is easier), and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, which maps your writing to a US school grade. Both are built from the same two signals, average sentence length and average syllables per word, so the tool also surfaces those raw counts. The result is a clear, repeatable benchmark instead of a vague feeling that something reads as too dense.

Reach for this tool whenever the audience is broad and attention is short: blog posts, landing pages, product descriptions, emails, help docs, and student essays. Online readers skim, and even highly educated people tend to prefer plainer prose when browsing, so most web content aims for a Flesch Reading Ease of roughly 60 to 70 (plain English, around an 8th-to-9th-grade level). Writers also use it to satisfy editorial style guides, to hit accessibility targets for public-sector or healthcare copy, and to keep a consistent voice across a large content library where many people contribute.

Under the hood, the checker counts words, sentences, and syllables, then plugs them into the published formulas. Flesch Reading Ease is 206.835 minus 1.015 times words-per-sentence minus 84.6 times syllables-per-word; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level is 0.39 times words-per-sentence plus 11.8 times syllables-per-word minus 15.59. Because they share inputs, the two scores move in opposite directions: an easier text earns a high reading-ease number and a low grade level. Shortening sentences and swapping long words for short ones moves both scores at once, which is why the tool highlights sentence length and syllable density alongside the totals.

A few honest notes on accuracy and privacy. Syllable counting in English is rule-based and not perfect, so treat the numbers as a reliable guide rather than an exact measurement, and expect small differences between tools that count contractions, numbers, or headings differently. The formulas judge sentence and word length only, not whether your argument is clear, accurate, or well organised, so a low grade level never guarantees good writing. Your text is analysed in your browser and is not stored or sent to a server, so you can safely check drafts, client work, or unpublished copy.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good Flesch Reading Ease score for a website?

For most online content, aim for a Flesch Reading Ease of about 60 to 70, which reads as plain English at roughly an 8th-to-9th-grade level. Technical or academic audiences can tolerate lower scores, while content for a very general audience reads more comfortably at 70 or above.

What is the difference between Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level?

Reading Ease gives a 0 to 100 score where higher means easier, while Grade Level translates the same data into a US school grade. They use the same inputs but move in opposite directions, so an easy text has a high reading-ease number and a low grade level.

How is the readability score calculated?

Both formulas use your average sentence length (words per sentence) and average word length (syllables per word). Reading Ease is 206.835 - 1.015(words/sentences) - 84.6(syllables/words); Grade Level is 0.39(words/sentences) + 11.8(syllables/words) - 15.59.

How do I improve my readability score?

Shorten long sentences, split compound sentences, and replace multi-syllable words with simpler ones. Both metrics reward shorter sentences and shorter words, so those edits raise the reading-ease score and lower the grade level at the same time.

Is a low grade level always better?

Not always. A low grade level only means short sentences and short words; it does not measure whether your writing is clear, accurate, or logically organised. Match the score to your audience rather than pushing every text to the lowest possible grade.

From our blog

How to Make a QR Code That Actually Scans Every Time

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

Generating a QR code takes a second, but making one that scans reliably on a crumpled flyer or a sun-faded window decal takes a little thought. The pattern you see is not random art: it includes fixed position markers in three corners, timing lines, and Reed-Solomon error-correction data that lets a scanner rebuild missing pieces. Understanding those parts helps you avoid the most common failure, a code that looks fine on screen but refuses to scan once it is printed small or partially obscured.

Start with the content, because it determines how dense the grid becomes. A QR code stores data in numeric, alphanumeric, or byte mode, and shorter strings use fewer modules. A long tracking URL packed with parameters creates a busy, fine-grained pattern that struggles at small sizes, while a short link produces large, forgiving modules. If your destination URL is long, shorten it first so the printed code stays readable from a normal scanning distance.

Error correction is the next lever. The four levels, L, M, Q, and H, recover roughly 7, 15, 25, and up to 30 percent of a damaged code. Level H is worth choosing for anything that will be printed outdoors, placed on a curved bottle, or stamped onto a textured surface, since it tolerates scuffs and partial coverage. The cost is a denser pattern, so pair a high error-correction level with short content to keep the modules large.

Size and contrast finish the job. Industry guidance suggests keeping a printed code at least around two by two centimetres, and larger if it will be scanned from a distance, with a clear quiet-zone margin of blank space around all four sides. Keep the code dark on a light background; inverting the colours or using a low-contrast pairing is the quickest way to make a phone camera give up. Always test the final printed code with more than one device before mass-producing it.

Finally, decide whether static is the right model for you. Because this tool builds static codes that carry no redirect, they never expire and report no scan data, which is ideal for Wi-Fi credentials, contact cards, and permanent signage. If you genuinely need to change the destination after printing or measure scan counts, you would want a dynamic code from a service that hosts the redirect, accepting that it ties your code to that provider remaining online.

  • Shorten long URLs before encoding so the pattern stays coarse and scans easily at small print sizes.
  • Choose error-correction level H for outdoor, curved, or textured surfaces where the code may get scuffed or partly covered.
  • Leave a clear quiet-zone margin of blank space around all four sides; cropping too tight breaks scanning.
  • Print at roughly two centimetres or more, keep it dark on light, and test on two different phones before going to production.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools