Fuel Consumption Converter

Convert between fuel consumption units instantly — pick any from and to unit.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • All units
  • Adjustable decimals
  • Instant results
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Bulk conversions
  • Conversion history

About the Fuel Consumption Converter

The Fuel Consumption Converter turns one fuel-economy figure into every other unit that drivers, importers, and travellers actually use: US miles per gallon, UK (Imperial) miles per gallon, litres per 100 kilometres, and kilometres per litre. Because the world has never agreed on a single way to express how thirsty a car is, a 7 L/100km label from a German brochure, a 35 MPG sticker from an American window, and a 14 km/L rating from a Japanese spec sheet can all describe roughly the same engine. This tool puts them on a level playing field so you can compare vehicles honestly instead of guessing.

Use it whenever the number you have is in the wrong unit for the decision you are making. Common moments: importing or buying a used car whose paperwork quotes a foreign standard, planning a road trip across borders to estimate fuel for the tank, fleet managers normalising mixed-source efficiency data, or simply double-checking a salesperson's claim. It also clears up the single most expensive mistake in this space: confusing US and Imperial gallons. An Imperial gallon is about 20% larger, so the same car looks more efficient in UK MPG than in US MPG even though nothing changed about the engine.

The maths hinges on whether a unit measures distance-per-fuel or fuel-per-distance. MPG and km/L go up as efficiency improves; L/100km goes down. That makes them inversely related, so you cannot scale between them with one flat multiplier. To get L/100km from US MPG, divide 235.215 by the MPG value; for UK MPG, divide 282.481 instead. To get L/100km from km/L, divide 100 by km/L. The constant 235.215 comes from multiplying litres per gallon (3.785412) by miles per 100 km (62.137). The converter applies the exact factors so 30 US MPG resolves to about 7.84 L/100km.

Everything is calculated in your browser as you type, so the figures you enter never leave your device and nothing is stored or sent to a server. The results are mathematically exact for the units you choose, but remember the conversion is only as accurate as the input: a manufacturer's combined-cycle rating, a real-world economy reading from your trip computer, and a hand-measured tank-to-tank figure can differ by 10% or more. Always confirm whether a quoted MPG is US or Imperial before you convert, because mixing the two is the most frequent reason conversions come out wrong.

Frequently asked questions

How do I convert MPG to L/100km?

Divide 235.215 by the value if it is US MPG, or divide 282.481 by it if it is UK (Imperial) MPG. For example, 30 US MPG equals 235.215 / 30 = about 7.84 L/100km.

Why can't I just multiply MPG by a single number to get L/100km?

Because the two units measure efficiency in opposite directions: MPG is distance per fuel and rises with efficiency, while L/100km is fuel per distance and falls with efficiency. They are inversely related, so you divide a constant by the value rather than multiplying.

What is the difference between US MPG and Imperial (UK) MPG?

A US gallon is 3.785 litres while an Imperial gallon is 4.546 litres, about 20% larger. The same car therefore shows a higher number in UK MPG than in US MPG, so always check which gallon a figure uses before converting.

How do I convert km/L to L/100km?

Divide 100 by the km/L value. For instance, 20 km/L equals 100 / 20 = 5 L/100km. This works because km/L is distance per litre and L/100km is litres per fixed distance.

Which unit means a car is more fuel efficient: a higher number or a lower one?

For MPG and km/L, a higher number is more efficient. For L/100km, a lower number is more efficient, since it means the car burns less fuel to cover the same 100 kilometres.

From our blog

Acres, Hectares, and Square Feet: How to Convert Area Without Getting It Wrong

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

Area measurements trip people up more than length because there is no single global standard and no clean pattern between the common units. A US listing gives a house in square feet and the lot in acres; a European listing gives both in square meters and large parcels in hectares; agricultural data flips between acres and hectares depending on who published it. The numbers involved are also large and unintuitive, so a small slip, like treating an acre as a tidy round figure, can throw off a material order or a price estimate by a wide margin.

The single most important idea is that area is the square of a length, so its conversion factor is the square of the linear one. People who know that a foot is 0.3048 meters sometimes assume a square foot is 0.3048 square meters, but it is actually 0.3048 multiplied by itself, which is 0.09290304 square meters. Get this wrong and your numbers are off by a factor of three or more. Every reliable area conversion is built on squared ratios, which is exactly the kind of arithmetic a converter handles without you having to remember it.

For day-to-day work, a handful of fixed values cover almost everything. One acre is exactly 43,560 square feet or about 4,046.86 square meters. One hectare is exactly 10,000 square meters, or about 2.471 acres, or roughly 107,639 square feet. One square meter is about 10.7639 square feet. These come from the same international agreements that fix length units, so they are exact by definition rather than measured approximations, and that is why two correct tools will always agree to the last decimal.

Knowing roughly how the units relate also helps you sanity-check any result. A hectare is a touch under two and a half acres, so a 4-hectare field is close to 10 acres. A square meter is a bit under 11 square feet, so a 50 m² apartment is around 538 square feet. An acre is a large but graspable unit, about the size of a standard sports pitch minus the end zones. Holding these rough anchors in mind means a mistyped digit or a wrong unit choice tends to produce an obviously wrong number that you'll catch instantly.

Finally, treat rounding deliberately. The conversion factors are exact, but the figure shown on screen is rounded for readability, and that gap matters at scale. Ordering turf or paint for a large area, or recording a parcel size on a legal document, calls for the longer value or a deliberate round to the precision the job needs. For a quick estimate, the short form is fine. The skill is simply matching how many decimals you keep to the stakes of the decision in front of you.

  • Remember area uses squared factors: 1 square foot is 0.09290304 square meters, not 0.3048, so never reuse a length conversion ratio for area.
  • Use the right scale for the job: keep land in acres or hectares and floor space in square feet or square meters, rather than forcing one unit on both.
  • Sanity-check results against quick anchors: a hectare is about 2.47 acres and a square meter is about 10.76 square feet, so spot-check before you commit to an order.
  • For material orders like flooring, paint, or turf, convert with the full precision and round up at the end, since rounding down on a large area can leave you short.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools