Calories Burned Calculator

Estimate the calories you burn during exercise from the activity, your weight and the duration. Free, instant, no signup.

How to use the Calories Burned Calculator

  1. Enter your values. Fill in the fields with your numbers.
  2. Calculate. Press Calculate to run the calories burned calculator.
  3. Use the result. Copy the result or try a related tool next.

Why use our Calories Burned Calculator

Instant results. Enter your figures and the calories burned calculator returns an answer in seconds.
Free & private. Runs in your browser — no signup, and nothing is sent to a server.
Accurate. Uses standard formulas so you can rely on the numbers.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Unlimited calculations
  • Instant results
  • No signup
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Save & compare scenarios
  • Export results

About the Calories Burned Calculator

The Calories Burned Calculator estimates how much energy your body uses during a specific physical activity, based on your body weight, the type of exercise, and how long you do it. Instead of guessing whether a 45-minute walk or a 30-minute cycling session burned more, you get a concrete kcal figure you can plan around. It is built for anyone tracking energy balance, from people managing weight and runners logging training load to general exercisers who simply want to know whether a workout earned the calories they think it did.

Use it whenever you want to put a number on movement: comparing two workouts, deciding how long to exercise to offset a meal, or estimating a weekly activity total to pair with a daily calorie target. It is most useful as a planning and comparison tool rather than a precise tracker, because it gives consistent, repeatable estimates that let you weigh one activity against another on the same basis. Athletes use it to gauge training expenditure, and people in a calorie deficit use it to sanity-check the 'calories out' side of the equation.

Under the hood it uses the MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) method, the same approach published in exercise-science reference tables. One MET is your energy cost at rest, roughly 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Each activity has a MET value scaled to that baseline, so the calculation is simply Calories = MET x body weight (kg) x duration (hours). A 70 kg person walking briskly at a 3.5 MET pace for one hour burns about 3.5 x 70 x 1 = 245 kcal. Heavier bodies and higher-intensity activities both push the number up.

Treat the result as a solid estimate, not a measured fact. MET-based figures are typically within 10 to 20 percent of true expenditure because they use population averages and do not account for your age, sex, fitness level, body composition, terrain, or movement efficiency. They are actually more consistent than wrist-worn trackers, which research has shown can be off by 27 percent or more on calories. The calculation runs entirely in your browser using a standard formula and stored MET values, so your weight and activity details are never sent to a server or saved anywhere.

Frequently asked questions

What formula does the calculator use?

It uses the metabolic equivalent method: Calories = MET x body weight in kilograms x duration in hours. Each activity has a MET value that represents how many times more energy it costs than resting, where 1 MET is roughly 1 kcal per kilogram per hour.

How accurate are the results?

MET-based estimates are usually within 10 to 20 percent of your actual calorie burn. They rely on population averages and do not adjust for your age, sex, fitness level, or terrain, so use the number as a reliable comparison and planning figure rather than an exact reading.

Why does my body weight change the result so much?

Calorie burn scales directly with body weight in the MET formula, because moving a heavier body requires more energy. Doing the same activity for the same time, a 90 kg person will burn noticeably more calories than a 60 kg person.

Is this more or less accurate than my fitness tracker?

It is often more consistent. Studies have found wrist-worn trackers can misestimate calories burned by 27 percent or more because they infer expenditure from heart rate and motion. The MET method gives a steady, repeatable estimate, though neither replaces lab-grade measurement.

Does it count the calories I would have burned anyway at rest?

Yes. The MET method includes your resting expenditure for that period, so the figure is gross calories burned during the activity, not the extra calories above resting. To get the 'net' burn, subtract roughly your resting rate for the same duration.

From our blog

How to Estimate Cubic Yards for Any Landscaping or Concrete Project

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

Bulk materials live in a frustrating gap between how you measure and how you buy. You pace out a flower bed in feet and inches, but the garden center sells mulch by the cubic yard and the ready-mix plant quotes concrete the same way. Cubic yards are simply the standard unit for material that arrives by the truckload, because a cubic yard is a manageable, deliverable chunk: a cube three feet on every side. Getting comfortable with that single unit lets you plan any fill job confidently, whether you are dressing a garden, pouring a slab, or building a gravel drive.

Start with three measurements: length, width, and depth. Length and width are usually easy to take in feet. Depth is where most people slip, because it is often shallow and naturally measured in inches. A typical mulch bed runs 3 to 4 inches deep, a decorative gravel layer 1 to 2 inches, and a standard concrete slab 4 inches. Whatever you use, convert depth to feet before you calculate by dividing inches by 12. Keeping every dimension in the same unit is the single most important habit for getting a correct answer.

With consistent units, the conversion is one short formula: length times width times depth gives cubic feet, and dividing by 27 gives cubic yards. The number 27 is not arbitrary; it is how many cubic feet fit inside that three-by-three-by-three-foot cube. So a 20-by-15-foot patio poured 4 inches thick works out to 20 x 15 x 0.333, about 100 cubic feet, which divided by 27 is roughly 3.7 cubic yards. Awkwardly shaped yards are easy too: split them into rectangles, calculate each piece, and add the results together at the end.

Geometry tells you the exact volume of the hole, but it does not tell you how much to order, and those are different numbers. Ground is rarely perfectly level, material compacts as it settles, and some always spills during placement. A common rule is to add about 10 percent for landscaping materials and 10 to 15 percent for concrete, rounding concrete up to the nearest quarter yard since you usually cannot buy a precise fraction. Suppliers sometimes price by the ton rather than the yard, so remember most gravel weighs roughly 1.4 to 1.7 tons per cubic yard if you need to cross-check a quote.

Run a quick sanity check before you commit. Coverage figures are an easy gut test: one cubic yard spreads over about 162 square feet at 2 inches deep or 108 square feet at 3 inches, so if your project area is far off from what your yardage implies, recheck your depth conversion first. For shallow four-inch slabs there is a handy shortcut contractors use: divide the total square footage by 81 to get cubic yards directly. Once your inputs are clean and a margin is added, the order you place should match the space you measured.

  • Always convert depth from inches to feet (divide by 12) before multiplying; a forgotten conversion is the most common reason an estimate comes out wildly wrong.
  • Break irregular spaces into simple rectangles or circles, calculate each separately, and sum the cubic yards rather than trying to average odd shapes.
  • Add roughly 10 percent extra for soil, mulch, and gravel and 10 to 15 percent for concrete, then round concrete up to the nearest quarter yard.
  • If a supplier quotes by the ton, remember most gravel runs about 1.4 to 1.7 tons per cubic yard, so you can translate between their price and your measured volume.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools